Re: removal of the vacation package
Ansgar Burchardt <email@example.com> writes:
> Bjørn Mork <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
>> sieve isn't likely to happen.
>> The world has become a lot more stupid since vacation was written....
> The statement in the second paragraph is false.
OK, then I got the wrong impression from the number of "out of office"
messages I see on public mailing lists.
> This also answers the first paragraph.
Care to provide a pointer to an example?