On Oct 25, Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote: > > Why? “Multiple init systems” is not a feature that any of our users > > should care of. It is not a functional goal. > Well I guess users *do* care... just look at the posts from the last few > days. Just because some people have different personal preferences it does not mean that we have to accomodate them at all costs. Just because some people believe that we should support multiple init systems it does not mean that they are right. > Just look around the posts in this thread, you will find many people who > are absolutely unhappy with both, political/philosophical behaviour > (look at Gunnar's post, where he brings it down to "antithetical to the > Unix culture IMO") of GNOME and technical and/or design issues (NM, > GNOME Shell, too little features). I am so much unhappy with GNOME that I use gnome-session with fvwm. But still, I see the need for a modern init system no matter what the GNOME developers want to do. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature