Re: Less dinstall FTW?
Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Is there a reason why we couldn't have incoming.d.o apt-able without
> lowering the dinstall frequency?
That is also possible, however fewer dinstall runs mean less data to
push to mirrors and to archive on snapshot.d.o as dists/ would change
less often. And with a public incoming.d.o, dinstall is less interesting
as the packages would already be available. Only changes to testing
would bring something new, but those only happen twice a day.