Re: Less dinstall FTW?
On 08/29/2013 12:13 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Is there a reason why we couldn't have incoming.d.o apt-able without
>> lowering the dinstall frequency?
> That is also possible, however fewer dinstall runs mean less data to
> push to mirrors and to archive on snapshot.d.o as dists/ would change
> less often.
How much data are we talking about here? As the built packages need to be pushed
at some point anyway, I guess the only additional data are package lists/release
files and so on?
If the amount of (additional) data brings some mirrors into trouble - is it
possible to push the mirrors with high bandwith more often than those with
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F