Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:43:33PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> But we have also gnome-settings-daemon in experimental which depends without
> an alternative on it. Now, if you look really close on the popcon data for
> systemd you see that in March 2013 there is a plateau reached for systemd,
> which "suddenly" at the end of the month is followed by the constant up –
> which neatly alines with the upload of the previously mentioned
> gnome-settings-daemon to experimental with a systemd dependency.
> So, what do you think: More people wanting to testdrive GNOME 3.8 or systemd?
Ha ha...
So why do we even discuss popcon data here, with it being messed with so
badly? Instead, there should be a repeat of the network-manager brouchacha.
--
ᛊᚨᚾᛁᛏᚣ᛫ᛁᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᚦᛖ᛫ᚹᛖᚨᚲ
Reply to: