Re: Git checkout/clean and double-buildability.
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:00:07AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Anyway, given that our infrastructure builds binary packages from a fresh
> unpacked source package, I would prefer if we keep the compromise that
> imperfect "clean" targets are not release-critical problems.
Note that for a big majority of packages, double builds work just fine.
In fact, that's most of what "make" is for: coping with partially
It's only if you do something strange when extra handling is needed.
So breaking partial builds is not something nice, and certainly contrary
to user expectations.