On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:44 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 08/30/2012 07:15 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > nowadays it is clear that > > the upstream maintainers of various stuff do not support a standalone > > /usr mounted by the init scripts: if /usr is a standalone file system > > then it must be mounted in the initramfs. > > > Instead of advertizing about (hostile) upstream's (bad) design and > decisions, you might as well, as the maintainer of udev, find ways > around this non-sense and uncruft all this. And I suppose Marco must remove all /usr dependencies from everything that installs a udev hook too? > This would be a lot more > productive than acting as a lemming following every stupid decision > of RedHat, and in the process give us choices in how we setup things > (like using RAID and LVM to store /usr while still being to use an > early boot (recovery) system in / without it). The initramfs is your early boot system. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part