[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugs opened upstream (was: can we (fully) fix/integrate NetworkManager (preferred) or release-goal its decommissioning)



On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 13:08 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Debian need *both*, and any efforts in this area should be put into
> making them interoperate.
That's my point! :-)

So for the curious amongst you... I've opened the following
ifupdown-plugin related bugs/improvement-ideas upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682375
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682377
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682406
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682407
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682408
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682409


All of them are "small" isolated problems or enhancement ideas, towards
better integration with ifupdown.


Further bugs for better integration with other native tools, I've opened
include:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681666
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681667
http://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/215


There was also some discussion between me and upstream at the now
closed:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681668
Most of the issues I describe there, are now split out in the bugs
above.


I'm not sure whether for myself will find time to work on any of these
(especially as I'd have to read into the NM code at first)... but
perhaps some of our NM experts here will find the one or the other worth
and "trivial" to fix/implement ;)


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Reply to: