On Aug 19, Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote: > Where do I see the main problems of NM? NM, as a design goal, is not supposed to be able to manage every possible configuration. I see no reason do /discourage/ it use: it has important use cases where it works well, the problem is just the people who are making hard to not install it when it is not appropriate for the job. > Or will we just mothball ifupdown silently and slowly (as it's replaced > by NM). As explained, NM is not a general ifupdown replacement. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature