[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: can we (fully) fix/integrate NetworkManager (preferred) or release-goal its decommissioning

On Aug 19, Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote:

> Where do I see the main problems of NM?
NM, as a design goal, is not supposed to be able to manage every 
possible configuration.
I see no reason do /discourage/ it use: it has important use cases where 
it works well, the problem is just the people who are making hard to not 
install it when it is not appropriate for the job.

> Or will we just mothball ifupdown silently and slowly (as it's replaced
> by NM).
As explained, NM is not a general ifupdown replacement.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: