On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:45:31 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > IIRC I built mesa with 3.0. I'll take a look at the patches. I also just > realised that I didn't run the X server with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set... is > that a problem, or is it just the clients that need the llvmpipe > libGL.so.1? Sorry for the dumb question, but my understanding of how all > the different bits of mesa/dri fit together is rather poor... > Should be enough to run the session with LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature