[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unofficial repositories on 'debian' domains



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 05.03.2012 15:17, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Please note nobody is comparing m.d.n to d.m.o. There are two 
> discussions going on in this thread.

I noted. That said, people still take debian.net domains in general
and mentors.d.n in particular as an example how people (ab-)use Debian
trademarks among different non-affiliated projects despite of being
entirely orthogonal target audiences between, say, mentors.debian.net
on one edge and debian-multimedia on the other.

The sole use case of mentors.debian.net domains is to extend and
provide services TO Debian. That's quite different to the purpose of
debian-multimedia for instance, which overrides Debian services to a
certain degree.

You know, it's not like we were going to start debian-mentors.org as
soon as someone decided debian.mentors.org would turn reality and
claim to be the better Mentors service.

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=w+Qs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: