[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)



Hello Jon Dowland,

Am 2011-04-11 10:37:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 02:11:38PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Installing NM by default will break systems which where running the last
> > 12 years without flaws.
> No, it will not.  It will not impact *running* systems at all. It will only
> impact newly installed systems.

And this is exactly the problem...

I can clone a System using a tarbal and then maybe upgrade  which  would
work but this mean, I have t transfer a  very  huge  Tarball  or  run  a
script which install from scratch with old setings, but if  the  default
install NM the whole  system  will  break  because  you  will  lost  the
network connection and can not more reconnect...

You need a local administrator to solv this problem, which  in  my  case
and probably many others, lead to big problems.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack

-- 
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux

itsystems@tdnet France EURL       itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack            Owner Michelle Konzack

Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz                 Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France           77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil         Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix

<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>  <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/>         <http://www.can4linux.org/>

Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ    #328449886

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: