Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 17:28 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote: > > Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> wrote: > > > >>> Recommends or Suggests: > >>> cdbs > >>> cmake > > > >> My reasoning on these two was that some people probably aren't > >> interested in switching from cdbs to quilt, > > > > You mean from cdbs to using debhelper directly? cdbs and quilt are > > orthogonal to each other. > > Sorry, yes. > > The push toward Source Format 3 with Quilt and DH7 happened around the > same time that I started doing packaging with any frequency so I'm > somewhat muddled on the "old way." Do I recall correctly that there > was some sort of patch management included in cdbs or am I thinking of > another tool? It is an one-liner to add a patch system to a cdbs rules file. You could freely choose between simple-patchsys, quilt and dpatch. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part