Re: packaging-dev meta package
Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> wrote:
>> Recommends or Suggests:
>> cdbs
>> cmake
> My reasoning on these two was that some people probably aren't
> interested in switching from cdbs to quilt,
You mean from cdbs to using debhelper directly? cdbs and quilt are
orthogonal to each other.
> so coming across packages still using it will be common for a while.
> CMake is a corollary to autoconf and heavily used in KDE-land, which
> seems like a not-insignificant number of packages.
It's a not-insigificant number of packages, but I think it's a lot fewer
in terms of number of developers, since I've never seen CMake used outside
of KDE-land.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: