Re: packaging-dev meta package
Not that I'd consider this package particularly useful, but...
* Benjamin Drung <firstname.lastname@example.org>, 2011-05-26, 22:49:
Here's the starting point for discussion:
dput | dupload
pbuilder | cowbuilder
Apart from missing initial "sbuild |", this should go to Recommends.
+ automake (sadly)
+ libtool (even more sadly)
bzr-builddeb (maybe Depends on Ubuntu)
Agreed. (Though I don't use bzr-* or git-* stuff.) I'd add documentation
packages here: developers-reference, debian-policy.
Seriously? Are you, grown-up developers, using it? oO
Recommends or Suggests:
The sad truth is that so many packages use cdbs, that is hard to live
without it. I'd put it in Recommends.
Even though I happen to main two (non-KDE-related) packages that
build-depends on cmake, I'd say it's exotic enough that should be