[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bash-completion with triggers

On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:11:57 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:

> On 2011-04-10 11:56, David Paleino wrote:
> > Now, with that time spent, I suppose the objections against triggers would
> > be fewer and less important. Am I wrong? :)
> > I must say I'm a bit uncomfortable with APT-hooks, since the update script
> > would then be run even for packages with no executable at all (lib*,
> > python-*, and so on). So, I still prefer a file-trigger.
> Sure, using APT hooks is a hack (like Goswin said already). From the
> time output above, I see it's now much faster than the man-db trigger? If
> so, I would say go ahead with file triggers.

Seems so. I still need to test it thoroughly, but I'm confident the time spent
won't vary too much. :)


 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: