A quick update... On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:16:20 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The trigger is going to happen very often (like the man-db one) and > with a 10s impact it's very noticable... I think the time spent was the major objection, so I stripped it down to... $ time ./update-bash-completion bash-completion: updating completion symlinks... done. real 0m0.225s user 0m0.148s sys 0m0.020s $ Now, with that time spent, I suppose the objections against triggers would be fewer and less important. Am I wrong? :) I must say I'm a bit uncomfortable with APT-hooks, since the update script would then be run even for packages with no executable at all (lib*, python-*, and so on). So, I still prefer a file-trigger. However, if I get objections again, I will just use hooks, and do what the community prefers :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature