Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
On 2010-06-29, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:24:00AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> No, my proposal is to move the package to a better home: backports.
> Same question as for Md with volatile:
> apt-cache rdepends xulrunner-1.9.1 libmozjs2d libwebkit-1.0-2
> What do you do with these packages ? backports too ? Do you realize some
> of these are part of the core of the GNOME desktop ?
Actually we have the same problem with clamav in volatile. We would need
to put all rdeps there, otherwise stuff gets messy. At least that's a
very restricted set, yours is... not feasible, I suppose.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Reply to: