Re: Bindv6only once again
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> is unwilling to fix.
I think there are probably other proprietary applications that people just
haven't tried using with testing yet. I suspect most uses of proprietary
applications are in environments where it's rare to use something other
> Unless the maintainer believes that we can get a fixed version before
> the release then I propose to stop setting bindv6only=1 by default.
> While it was a useful experiment, since it allowed to expose and fix a
> fair number of bugs, it should not compromise the general usability of
> Debian systems.
I agree with this decision.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>