[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bindv6only once again

On Jun 13, Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:

> You are taking the wrong approach to things. We should see if it is
> still a major problem at freeze time, or if we have managed to fix all
> the buggy software before freeze.
I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
is unwilling to fix.
Unless the maintainer believes that we can get a fixed version before
the release then I propose to stop setting bindv6only=1 by default.
While it was a useful experiment, since it allowed to expose and fix a
fair number of bugs, it should not compromise the general usability of
Debian systems.

I do not consider the POSIX-related arguments interesting.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: