[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [gmail] Re: Bug#565675: ITP: pthsem -- pth replacement with semaphore support

> I need pthsem, so I only want a working version with all features I
> need.

All I care about is that there is an agreement between the Debian
community and the upstream developer. Martin is very active in
supporting his environment and in that respect I am to inclined to
support his decision.

Can we conclude that pthsem is a valid branch, worth a seperate package?

An alternative for Martin is probably to include/hide pthsem in bcusdk;
but that would not be as clean IMHO (ffmpeg anyone?)

  greetz, marc
Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.
crichton 2.6.26 #1 PREEMPT Tue Jul 29 21:17:59 CDT 2008 GNU/Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: