Re: Bug#565675: ITP: pthsem -- pth replacement with semaphore support
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > > * Package name : pthsem
> > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
> > package? Else you'll have to share the Debian patches.
> The situation with GNU pth is:
I guessed so, but still.
The problem is that people know pth, but they don't know pthsem (yet).
It will be a long time before people discover that there is a new
interesting pthsem package that basically does the same as pth with
quite a few extra features, is not dead etc. Why not just replacing the
existing pth package with pthsem to avoid that delay?
Were I Martin Kögler, I'd even just request GNU to become the new
maintainer of pth.