Re: GPL-licensed software linked against libssl on buildds!
Patrick Schoenfeld <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:30:13AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> That does not mean that we shouldn't fix such bugs if they arise
>>> (obviously we should) but having priority on it is a different thing.
>> Then I'm not sure that you're disagreeing with me?
> Oh I don't. However in one of your first mails you sounded quiet
> different. Somewhere in the line of "we do not need buildds with clean
> environments, because after all we want packages to be buildable in
> dirty environments as well".
Hm, well, I re-read all of my messages to this thread and I'm not seeing
it, but I certainly apologize for giving you that impression! That's not
what I was trying to communicate at all.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>