On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:29:48 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > It would have been MORE than easy to have bz2 support in 1.0. There is > absolutely no reason why it needs a 3.0 just for a different compression. > But that wasnt wanted. By whom? dpkg maintainers, archive admins, package maintainers? tar.bz2 support is the only reason I see for considering 3.0 at this point… Cheers, Julien