On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:30:11PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > I believe the upstream was last modified in 1997. So that's > 12 years of "seniority", but it's also 12 years in which > the upstream source was essentially unmaintained. If we > really did decide that our priority was packages, rather > than users, I'd hope some other metric than age was used to > resolve any such conflicts. While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you (it was me who did the git -> gnuit rename), I just wanted to point out that gnuit now actively maintained upstream (I adopted it upstream a couple of years ago) Ian. -- Ian Beckwith - ianb@debian.org - ianb@erislabs.net - http://erislabs.net/ianb/ GPG fingerprint: AF6C C0F1 1E74 424B BCD5 4814 40EC C154 A8BA C1EA Listening to: A Silver Mt. Zion - C'mon Come On (Loose An Endless Longing)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature