On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Pierre Habouzit (madcoder@madism.org) [090919 01:08]: > > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will > > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to > > block them until all the binNMUs are done, I don't think it is). Then > > please ask for binNMUs of all the package that B-D on libjpeg-dev. Then > > we will let that migrate. > > The question is: Are libjpeg62 and libjepg7 co-useable? (This only > works if symbol versioning is turned on.) Huh, libjpeg62 and libjpet7 have different so-name so they are co-installable. I don't get what you mean with "co-useable" and it certainly has nothing to do with symbol versioning. > If so, this is not a real transition, and we could all relax (packages > will just one by one start using the new libary, and we can just > rebuild packages slowly, and everthing is ok). That's exactly what I intend to do, that's why I don't want bill to make people change their build-dependencies _yet_. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature