[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ping for gtk+extra2 removal - implications for libgtkada2 and gpsim



Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> OK, I think that explains it.  Here is what I propose:
> 
> - I will adopt the package gtk+extra and maintain it in Debian for as long as
> GTK+2 is in Debian and libgtkada2 needs it.
> - I will not update the package to use GTK+3.
> - I will prominently mark the package as deprecated and discourage new packages
> from using it. As part of this I will move the package to main/oldlibs.
> - I will inform GtkAda's upstream about the pending removal of GTK+2 which will
> happen in the future, probably after June 2010; this gives them one year to
> reimplement the GtkAda widgets that presently use gtk+extra with GTK+3.
> - When a new upstream version of GtkAda removes the dependency on gtk+extra or
> GTK+2 disappears from Debian, I will ask for removal of the package.
> 
> OK?

Sounds good to me.

Best,
Emilio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: