On Sat Jun 20 09:28, David Paleino wrote: > Now that I read Ben's mail again, I see that his concern is also about the > Maintainer field. I suppose that should be a real name too then? Or is it ok > having a pseudonym because it's the sponsor taking responsibility for > the upload? (given that using this pseudonym he won't ever become a DD/DM) Sponsors take responsibility for the upload, so this should be fine. Also, going back to the note about reputation; There's no reason reputation can't be associated with a pseudonym or with a GPG key attached to a pseudonym. Anyway, I have no idea whether my sponsorees who I have never met and haven't gone through ID check are using their real names. If I don't care about that, why should I care about someone who is using a pseudonym that doesn't look like a real name. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature