Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem?
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Sure. I can hack things so that I have a writable home directory
> for root while having a read only /. But then it is incorrect to state
> that it "works out of the box".
If you have a read-only / you need to have /var and /home as seperate
filesystem. Requireing to have /root seperate as well is no
different. That is still out of the box for me.
Also I don't consider writing to /root normal. "Works out of the box
for normal operations" if you will.