[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s



Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 22:36 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> Let's see ... another series of MUA-related standards documents, RFC
> 2045 and following (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), was
> published in November 1996, close to 2 years before the one we're
> talking about.  Maybe it's just me, but it seems like 2 years ago, a
> MUA that didn't support MIME would have been laughed out of town.  Does
> that mean it's finally time to expect support for RFC 2369?

The same could be said of RFC2184… which Outlook still doesn’t
implement.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `-     future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: