Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s

[Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org>]

[Noah Slater]
> Mandating something which relies on the wholesale upgrade of hundreds
> of MUAs to get right by default doesn't sound like a good solution to
> me. I don't care how many RFCs you wave in my face. :)

Let's see ... another series of MUA-related standards documents, RFC
2045 and following (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), was
published in November 1996, close to 2 years before the one we're
talking about.  Maybe it's just me, but it seems like 2 years ago, a
MUA that didn't support MIME would have been laughed out of town.  Does
that mean it's finally time to expect support for RFC 2369?
-- 
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/