Re: Consistent formating long descriptions as input data
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:12:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> was heard to say:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> I would prefer Restructured Text, for the simple reason that it has an
>> actual specification with a fairly complete description of its syntax
>> and semantics.
> I do not have practical experience with both and so I do not have
> any preference. The only thing I'f fear is that we might loose track
> in finally solving the problem in discussing which library to use.
> So do you think I should try to switch from markdown to reST in the
> debug output project?
I hesitate to tell you what to do, since I'm not the one doing the
work. But I think it would be worthwhile to at least prototype both
options and see how they stack up. I also should say that I only have
practical experience with Markdown (except that I've edited Wikis
occasionally and some of them use RST); the alternative looks better
to me, but it's easy to say that when I haven't actually used it. :-)
> For those who are interested: At
Wow, that's a lot of work! I certainly won't ask you to do it all