[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW processing

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:04:05AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> I think removing a package from a distribution should need more reasons
> than a REJECT of that package.

Why?  In both cases, the package is undistributable.  How does it make
more sense to keep an undistributable version in the archive than
to replace it with a different undistributable version?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> You should know that the problem essantially was an incomplete relicense to
> GPL-3 which has since be fixed. It just happened that no one notice before Mike
> had a look at it. IMO a removal seems to harsh to me for this. 

Why then is a REJECT not too harsh?

Reply to: