Re: Sponsorship requirements and copyright files
On Tue, Mar 24 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Nice sound bite. But a spec or a standard's big value comes if
>> it is fixed to be widely accepted, even if it means that some parts of
>> the standard are "optional".
> I hope that you will contribute your opinion when DEP 5 has a draft to
I am expressing my opinion now, on a mailing list devoted to
debian development. I have not been keeping up witht eh bureaucratic
rigmarole that seems to be being wrapped around discussions, not after
we got the notice that there was a topic to be discussed, but we should
not discuss it since the red-tape software was broken.
Whoever is drafting the draft ought to be paying attention to
the feedback being generated now, and create a better draft to start
New Hampshire law forbids you to tap your feet, nod your head, or in any
way keep time to the music in a tavern, restaurant, or cafe.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C