Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

[Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> 
>> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>>   Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
>>> Depends line.
>> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
>> being Architecture: all or any.
>>
> 
> Quoting my self (first message):
>> This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or because the
>> package should be Architecture: all.

I fail to see why. Imagine for example a -dev package providing only .h
files, but depending on the architecture. It has to be Architecture: any
 and does not need to Depends on a package.

You really have to look at the contents of the package and verify it
does not change between architecture.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net