Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:39:36 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k5msgdx3.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080102201140.GA5323@artemis.madism.org> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Wed\, 02 Jan 2008 21\:11\:40 +0100")
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org> <[🔎] 20080102201140.GA5323@artemis.madism.org>

Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:

>>> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
>>>    libgss-dbg (U)
>>>    shishi-dbg (U)

>> rriiiight...

>   Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> Depends line.

Indeed.  Fixed in CVS, and I'll file a wishlist lintian bug to remind me
or someone to write a check at some point.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by Date: Re: Faster shutdown and the ubuntu "multiuser" update-rc.d extention
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread