Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:16:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080102201621.GL7125@evy>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080102201140.GA5323@artemis.madism.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org> <[🔎] 20080102201140.GA5323@artemis.madism.org>

On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>   Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> Depends line.

After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
being Architecture: all or any.

-- 
Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpkl4EARDPMx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by Date: Re: some packges are waiting for i386 build
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread