Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:11:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080102201140.GA5323@artemis.madism.org>
Mail-followup-to: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
> >    libgss-dbg (U)
> >    shishi-dbg (U)
> 
> rriiiight...

  Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
Depends line.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpq5CAzg1iOD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois@enst-bretagne.fr>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread