Re: Override changes standard -> optional
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > It's difficult to see how any of these packages fail the *definition* of
> > standard.
> Its difficult to see how any of these packages fulfill the *definition*
> of standard.
>
> The definition is wide enough to let us discuss without end.
Yet you managed to come to a list of packages to demote, so on what
basis?
> > For comparison, both of these packages are part of the Ubuntu standard
> > system.
> Thats not really convincing, we are in debian-devel after all :)
I think it makes sense to look at what other distros are doing if we
discuss the set of expected commands on a standard installation.
--
Loïc Minier
Reply to: