Re: NEW processing
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Clint Adams <email@example.com> writes:
> > I don't understand the logical connection here. IMO, NEW processing should
> > be a rubber stamp, with only the checking required to satisfy whatever our
> > needs are for liability purposes.
> In my relatively short experience even the legalese check is
> definitely NOT rubber stamping, considering how many NEW packages fail
> licensing/copyright checks...
Real licensing/copyright checks, or the ones where packages are rejected out
of binary NEW for debian/copyright disagreements that have no bearing at all
on the binary packages?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/