Re: NEW processing
2008/12/3 Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:45:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I'm very happy about the additional checks the ftpteam does. If people want a
>> faster crappy distribution, there are options, no need to turn Debian into
> I don't understand the logical connection here. IMO, NEW processing should
> be a rubber stamp, with only the checking required to satisfy whatever our
> needs are for liability purposes. How does maintaining an arbitrary
> bottleneck make us better than Ubuntu and not the contrary?
I agree that an arbitray bottleneck doesn't make us better than
Ubuntu, but I guess the people reference the statements that talked
about a "tradeoff in quality" in favor of less time, with what they
eventually disagree (as I do, too).