On 03/12/08 at 13:56 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> (03/12/2008): > > That's not true. We imposed that reviewing step to ourselves, and, if > > it's doing more harm (by slowing down development and annoying > > contributors) than good (by detecting mistakes and improving Debian's > > overall quality), we could simply decide to drop it. (or to drop it > > partially, for some categories of uploads). > > How do you see the legalese aspect? In the harm or good box? I don't think that we should drop the legal review (that would probably be dangerous). However, NEW reviews seem to cover a lot of other aspects currently, which might explain why it takes so much time. If people feel that a reviewing service is needed, we could split that out of NEW processing and have a separate service (or just use debian-mentors@ and http://mentors.debian.net). > > always let some things get thought while they shouldn't) rather than > ^^^^^^^ > through? yes -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature