[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW processing

Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> (03/12/2008):
> That's not true. We imposed that reviewing step to ourselves, and, if
> it's doing more harm (by slowing down development and annoying
> contributors) than good (by detecting mistakes and improving Debian's
> overall quality), we could simply decide to drop it. (or to drop it
> partially, for some categories of uploads).

How do you see the legalese aspect? In the harm or good box?

> It's funny how in Debian, we always prefer to add more checks (which
> always let some things get thought while they shouldn't) rather than
> trusting developers to do the right thing. It's similar to what
> happened to the NM process.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: