Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> (03/12/2008):
> That's not true. We imposed that reviewing step to ourselves, and, if
> it's doing more harm (by slowing down development and annoying
> contributors) than good (by detecting mistakes and improving Debian's
> overall quality), we could simply decide to drop it. (or to drop it
> partially, for some categories of uploads).
How do you see the legalese aspect? In the harm or good box?
> It's funny how in Debian, we always prefer to add more checks (which
> always let some things get thought while they shouldn't) rather than
^^^^^^^
through?
> trusting developers to do the right thing. It's similar to what
> happened to the NM process.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature