Lucas Nussbaum <email@example.com> (03/12/2008): > That's not true. We imposed that reviewing step to ourselves, and, if > it's doing more harm (by slowing down development and annoying > contributors) than good (by detecting mistakes and improving Debian's > overall quality), we could simply decide to drop it. (or to drop it > partially, for some categories of uploads). How do you see the legalese aspect? In the harm or good box? > It's funny how in Debian, we always prefer to add more checks (which > always let some things get thought while they shouldn't) rather than ^^^^^^^ through? > trusting developers to do the right thing. It's similar to what > happened to the NM process. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature