On dim, nov 23, 2008 at 05:52:46 +0000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > I found it generally hilarious and a well-made point, though I agree the > presentation could have been in better taste. On dim, nov 23, 2008 at 08:23:02 +0000, Amaya wrote: > Steve Kemp wrote: > > with debian-women making strides forward it seems this was a step > > backward. > > Same here On dim, nov 23, 2008 at 05:03:27 +0000, Scott Dier wrote: > Sure, the first message shouldn't have been on announce, but its > impossible to fix a wrong with yet another wrong. [and so on] FWIW we had this discussion already: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00920.html Could we fucking stop repeating the same old discussions over and over and over ? every two year we troll about firmwares, bad jokes on d-d-a, what else ? COULD WE PLEASE FUCKING LEARN FROM OUR PAST PLEASE ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpge4nFaOpUw.pgp
Description: PGP signature