Re: RC bug for >10 packages
El sáb, 25-10-2008 a las 18:32 +0200, Adeodato Simó escribió:
> * Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:47 +0200]:
> > Yep, this is the case, it includes pre-compiled regular expressions and
> > these appear to be incompatible between versions of pcre.
> > [...snip...]
> > > > then set a Depend in the language packages to that
> > > > particular version of apertium, then recompile and upload the packages.
> > > The option that sounds more realistic, at least for now, is having the
> > > language packages Depend: libpcre3 (<< next_upstream_version), or
> > > something along the lines.
> > We've come up with a better solution, which is to add dependencies to
> > the apertium package, and then make the apertium package depend on a
> > particular version of pcre3. It's safer this way, as I can't find out
> > anything about compatibility of precompiled regular expressions in pcre
> > between versions, so better to assume they aren't.
> Add what dependencies to the apertium package? Can you be specific?
Heh, actually there is an ambiguity there... I should have spotted it.
What I mean is:
Add the specific dependence in each language package to apertium and not
to libpcre3. The language packages already depend on apertium, but we'll
just make this specific with substvar