[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again

Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 05:21:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Clint Adams sent a request to d-www to have the CoC changed and I have
>> replied with a strong NACK to that suggestion. If the CoC should be
> You neglected to Cc me.

Wrong. You neglected to request to be CCed.
>> changed, it should be done after a proper discussion (on d-project
>> probably) and at least be done in coordination with the listmasters, not
>> as the result of an individual request by a random DD.
> Since the code of conduct was published without discussion and a
> consensus within the project, and since modified by "random" DDs
> (depending on whether or not you consider the members of webwml random)
> without discussion or consensus within the project, I consider this a
> somewhat deceitful stance to take.

That's bullshit. The CoC has been in place and unchanged for years. Please 
check the origin in the relevant VCS before making such claims.
It was also not committed by "random members of webwml", but by a Debian 
Listmaster, i.e. by someone acting within his delegated authority.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: