On 25/01/2008, Frank Küster wrote: > I don't think these bugs should be closed without considering the type > of the removed package. If it's just gotten useless or uninteresting, > no problem. But if there's some kind of successor (like foo2 in a new > source package, iceweasel to firefox, or TeXLive to teTeX) then the > maintainer should check whether the old bug still applies to the new > package. Speaking of which, would it make sense somehow to track these successors? One might think of an additional source field for the control file. I know it's quite easy to remember firefox -> iceweasel, but that might help tracking successors over years, even if they aren't as famous as that one. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpdSOUWLEftj.pgp
Description: PGP signature