Re: Which spell checkers to include by default?
Hi all (again)!
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:54:34 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:17:52 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Manoj Srivastava]
>>> Are these packages a drop in replacement for ispell?
>>
>> None of the spell checkers are drop in replacements for the others.
>> Each program need to have support for ispell, aspell, myspell and/or
>> hunspell. This is why I want us to try to get as many packages as
>> possible to switch to hunspell, to make it possible to drop ispell
>> completely.
>
> It seems that I cannot find a comparison of the differences spell
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This should have been "differences BETWEEN spell checkers" or "DIFFERENT
spell checkers", as you prefer ;-)
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Reply to: