Re: Which spell checkers to include by default?
Hi all!
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:17:52 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Manoj Srivastava]
>> Are these packages a drop in replacement for ispell?
>
> None of the spell checkers are drop in replacements for the others.
> Each program need to have support for ispell, aspell, myspell and/or
> hunspell. This is why I want us to try to get as many packages as
> possible to switch to hunspell, to make it possible to drop ispell
> completely.
It seems that I cannot find a comparison of the differences spell
checkers. Please, could you enlighten me on why hunspell should be a
better default one?
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Reply to: