Re: Bug#431482: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:31:13PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:25:11 -0700]:
> > But at a minimum, yes, the audacious-plugins package should be depending on
> > libaudacious by way of shlibdeps.
> There is no NEEDED entry in the plugins against libaudaciousX.
That's a bug in the plugins, isn't it? Don't they refer to symbols from
libaudacious?
> Do you mean hardcoding the dependency instead? (Which, true, solves the
> situation.)
Nope.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: